The Australian authorities has made a rare resolution to deeply divide the Australian group beneath the guise of advancing social cohesion and bringing us all collectively. How such a patently silly political resolution might be made by educated adults is past comprehension. As soon as once more this isn’t one among my typical weblog posts the place I write as an expert (educational) macroeconomist. I’m scripting this as an energetic creator that’s now dealing with suppression of my capability for self-expression by an more and more authoritarian authorities machine (at each federal and state ranges) that has been, it appears, captured by a selected foyer group that workout routines its affect and energy in essentially the most pernicious and strong trend. What’s the difficulty? The Australian authorities has invited the Israeli President Isaac Herzog to go to Australia as their visitor and is tipped to make a proper handle to our federal parliament. The choice is mistaken on so many ranges and the next responses of the governments (state and federal) to what they now realise is a mass groundswell of opposition among the many group to the choice is even worse.
The choice to ask Herzog is extraordinary given his personal monitor report and the monitor report of the present Israeli authorities.
The Australian authorities claims that his invitation was prolonged to permit him to help the mourning of individuals of Jewish religion after the brutal murders of their group at Bondi Seaside on December 14, 2025.
Nevertheless, Herzog just isn’t a non secular determine, which one would assume to be a extra strategy supply of succour for these of any religion who’re grieving their misplaced ones after a surprising occasion equivalent to unfolded at Bondi Seaside.
Herzog is the top of state and thus is the titular consultant of that state.
And whether or not you prefer it stated or not, that state is a monster.
In 2024, the – Worldwide Courtroom of Justice (ICJ) – launched their – Abstract of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 – which is an in depth documentation of the best way through which Israel has handled the Palestinians for the reason that ‘Six-Day Conflict’ in 1967, when Israel first “occupied all of the territories of Palestine beneath British Mandate past the Inexperienced Line” after which progressively began “to ascertain or help settlements within the territories it occupied and took a variety of measures geared toward altering the standing of the Metropolis of Jerusalem.”
It paperwork how the state of Israel conducts “the continued violation by Israel of the fitting of the Palestinian folks to self-determination”; and helps the ““extended occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, together with measures geared toward altering the demographic composition, character and standing of the Holy Metropolis of Jerusalem”; and adopts “discriminatory laws and measures” geared toward thwarting the freedoms of the Palestinian folks.
It believes the frequent thread is that “these insurance policies and practices are opposite to worldwide legislation.”
It declared the continued Israeli presence within the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) to be unlawful.
It discovered that whereas Israel is a signatory to a number of worldwide human rights agreements however persistently violates them and denies the Palestinian folks the fitting to self willpower.
It calls for that Israel instantly finish their occupation of the OPT, evacuate the unlawful settlements and supply full reparation for the harm it has prompted because of that occupation.
It’s a very highly effective assertion by the ICJ, which international locations equivalent to Australia have lengthy accepted as being the professional UN establishment for resolving conflicts between states.
Like a lot of the UN equipment, its selections will be scuppered by the veto energy of the 5 everlasting members of the UN Safety Council, which makes it a somewhat lame duck physique by way of enforceability however not by way of defining the ethical compass for international locations equivalent to Australia, which holds itself out as a superb worldwide citizen.
So with out even contemplating the private conduct of the Israeli President within the persecution of the Palestinians, the truth that he’s the top of state and represents that state is adequate to disqualify him from cheap discourse with nations that purport to defend the ideas of worldwide legislation.
The occupation just isn’t solely unlawful beneath that legislation however Israel has been required by the ICJ to face trial for genocide because of its Gaza invasion and brutal and unconscionable mass homicide of tens of 1000’s of harmless civilians.
In 2024, the ICJ issued this word – Abstract of the Order of 26 January 2024 – which addressed South Africa’s petition to institute “proceedings in opposition to Israel regarding alleged violations within the Gaza Strip of the Conference on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”.
The Courtroom discovered that “the allegations had been believable sufficient to warrant rapid, precautionary measures” and in March 2024, a UN particular rapporteur discovered that there have been “cheap grounds” for adopting the conclusion that the genocide threshold had been met.
Whereas it’s Netanyahu and his political cronies which have been making these army selections, the President stands liable for them as head of state.
In any other case, the idea of head of state has no that means.
Below the – Fundamental Legislation – of Israel, the President’s position is to:
… stand on the head of the State, representing the state of Israel overseas and fostering nationwide unity at dwelling.
Curiously, Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann wrote in a letter of resignation (July 30, 1948) that (Supply):
I’ve determined to sever my ties with the place that has been compelled upon me. I’m not ready to make use of my identify to supply cowl for every part at the moment going down within the Land of Israel and can’t make peace with every part that the federal government is doing with out with the ability to affect something or forestall it … I actually and actually don’t wish to trigger any issues or difficulties for the new child state, which, in any case, is mired in critical and troublesome issues, however I can’t reconcile myself to being solely a passive companion to this enterprise, which is being performed alongside strains that I can’t tolerate.
There have been notable examples, when the usually symbolic head of state in Israel, has transcended into the political area.
For instance (Supply):
After the Yom Kippur Conflict, President Ephraim Katzir triggered a public outcry when he stated, “We’re all responsible.” President Yitzhak Navon threatened to resign until a state fee of inquiry was established to analyze the massacres on the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon.
So, historical past tells us that when the politicians are pursuing disdainful insurance policies, the President has made it clear they stand in opposition to them.
There was many ugly selections taken by the Israeli authorities over time however the massacres in Gaza stand out as heinous and with out justification.
As a consequence, there is no such thing as a manner a head of a state that has dedicated conflict crimes ought to be allowed into Australia and he ought to be arrested on the border if he tries to enter.
The truth that the Australian authorities has invited him is an abrogation of our nationwide duty to respect worldwide legislation.
Additional, Herzog’s personal place just isn’t acceptable.
On September 16, 2025, the UN Unbiased Worldwide Fee of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, together with East Jerusalem, and Israel launched a report – Authorized evaluation of the conduct of Israel in Gaza pursuant to the Conference on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide = which amongst different issues concluded that Herzog was implicated within the genocide because of him saying on October 13, 2023 that:
… it’s a complete nation on the market that’s accountable. It’s not true, this rhetoric about civilians who weren’t conscious and never concerned. It’s completely not true. They may have risen up. They may have fought in opposition to that evil regime which took over Gaza in a coup d’état.
Simply as Herzog might resign over the conduct of the Israeli authorities.
The UN Fee argued that:
The Fee notes that the assertion of President Isaac Herzog didn’t expressly name for the genocide of the Palestinian folks in Gaza. Nevertheless, the assertion should be assessed within the context of the start of a conflict the place the Israeli safety forces had simply initiated their army operations in Gaza. Therefore, the assertion that a complete nation is liable for the assault of seven October 2023 might fairly be interpreted as incitement to the Israeli safety forces personnel to focus on the Palestinians in Gaza as a bunch as being collectively culpable for the 7 October 2023 assault in Israel.
The UN Fee interpreted Herzog’s declare that if the folks of Gaza didn’t agree with Hamas they may stand up as saying as a result of they didn’t instigate an rebellion “they had been all equally accountable”.
An earlier UN Human Rights Council report (issued June 10, 2024) – Detailed findings on the army operations and assaults carried out within the Occupied Palestinian Territory from 7 October to 31 December 2023 – famous that “A number of statements by Israeli officers advocated for collective punishment in opposition to the Palestinian folks as an entire or the inhabitants of Gaza specifically”.
The 2025 Fee report famous that the President’s message that “there aren’t any uninvolved” was relayed to IDF troopers and prominently repeated in “a number of public locations”.
The vital conclusion the Fee reached was that:
On incitement to genocide, the Fee concludes that Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after which Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, have incited the fee of genocide and that Israeli authorities have didn’t take motion in opposition to them to punish this incitement.
Then there’s the notorious picture of Herzog signing the missile to spice up the morale of the IDF murderers.
Such an individual shouldn’t be invited by our authorities as a dignitary to tour the nation.
The last word conflation
One of many penalties of inviting a personality like Herzog to Australia is that’s consolidates the conflation that the Zionist ideologues have been pushing that criticism of the federal government of Israel and the conduct of the IDF is equal to anti-semitism.
That conflation has been promoted as a manner of avoiding any scrutiny of the murderous behaviour of the Israeli state.
It’s proving to be a really profitable technique.
The assaults at Bondi Seaside in December have been constructed as an anti-semitic motion and I don’t intend to dispute that illustration.
Revered commentator Laura Tingle, nonetheless, does make the plain level in her article (February 7, 2026) – Albanese’s invitation to Herzog is a shift in his strategy to Israel:
However an uncomfortable query nonetheless to be answered has at all times been the extent to which the motivation for that hatred was in any manner a response to the actions of the Israeli authorities in Gaza after October 7.
I thought-about that difficulty considerably in my earlier weblog publish – Curbing the liberty of writers won’t advance human rights (January 15, 2026).
The anger over the Gaza motion by the Israeli authorities has made folks of the Jewish religion world wide much less protected.
And by bringing Herzog, who’s now implicated by the UN Fee and by his personal actions as being social gathering to the genocide (tacit or not), to Australia to console the Jewish group, is conflating these actions with being Jewish.
Australians typically are appalled by anti-semitic actions however at the moment are confused by the presence of Herzog as a Zionist image.
The Australian authorities was pressured by the Zionist foyer in Australia, together with the Govt Council of Australian Jewry, to convey Herzog out right here.
Nevertheless, the extra progressive Jewish group in Australia – The Jewish Council of Australia – printed an announcement (January 28, 2026) – Jewish Council calls on Albanese to rescind Herzog invitation – which stated:
The Jewish Council of Australia has expressed outrage that the Albanese Authorities would gas the flames of division by inviting Herzog to go to Australia, warning that his journey is totally inappropriate and offensive and can rightly spark mass protests.
President Isaac Herzog is immediately implicated in Israel’s genocide in opposition to Palestinians in Gaza …
This ought to be a second for collective mourning, reflection and care. It’s not a second to host the top of a state which has been discovered to have dedicated a genocide in Gaza …
Inviting a international head of state who’s implicated in an ongoing genocide as a consultant of the Jewish group is deeply offensive and dangers entrenching the harmful and antisemitic conflation between Jewish identification and the actions of the Israeli state. This doesn’t make Jews safer. It does the alternative.
That may be a very highly effective assertion from a number one Jewish foyer in Australia, which I help 100 per cent.
Additionally they have a petition that anybody can signal opposing Herzog’s go to – Petition: say no to Herzog visiting Australia.
Rising constraints on our freedoms imposed
The NSW Labor Premier responded to the groundswell of opposition to the go to by granting the NSW police ‘further powers’.
These further powers embody granting the police the ability to shut off entry to varied components of town and forcing folks to maneuver out of sure components of town.
Will probably be the primary time that the NSW authorities has invoked these powers to take care of a go to from a excessive profile international customer.
It has solely beforehand been used for the most important sporting occasions.
The motive is to suppress professional protest by individuals who deeply oppose this resolution of the federal government.
It goes with a variety of more and more authoritarian guidelines and rules which might be designed to stifle public opinion that that the Zionist ideologues in Australia don’t need the general public to listen to.
Conclusion
As the previous Australian human rights commissioner, Chris Sidoti requested in his glorious UK Guardian article (February 5, 2026) – Isaac Herzog is accused of inciting genocide in Gaza. He shouldn’t be welcomed to Australia:
What was the prime minister considering when he invited Herzog?
Again to economics on Thursday!
That’s sufficient for at this time!
(c) Copyright 2026 William Mitchell. All Rights Reserved.
