Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admitted to having an affair with an alleged Chinese language spy, and a few are questioning the timing and agenda behind these allegations.
Earlier than we begin, let’s set the size of Nvidia in right now’s market.
First, it’s one of many “Magnificent 7” (Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla) that make up over 33% of the market cap of the S&P 500.
https://t.co/rE1ZZu5srI
— Nat Wilson Turner (@natwilsonturner) November 11, 2026
And among the many Magazine 7, Nvidia makes up 18% of the whole market cap.
https://t.co/9sijbkXOH4
— Nat Wilson Turner (@natwilsonturner) November 11, 2026
After which there’s this: “US Economic system More and more Revolves Round Knowledge Facilities” and this:
Level being, Nvidia is a large deal, and this scandal (amongst different components) is having a large impression on its valuation and probably the broader US market and financial system:
https://t.co/4nmWuireaP
— Nat Wilson Turner (@natwilsonturner) November 11, 2026
Let’s begin with the chain of reports tales that constructed into a company communications disaster of epic proportions (HT to B. of Moon of Alabama, from whom we’ll be listening to extra in a second).
- Nvidia’s Largest Southeast Asian Accomplice Dogged by China Chip Smuggling Questions Bloomberg December 22, 2025
As B. wrote, “(These allegations) didn’t make a lot sense as (Megaspeed) has all the time been free to hire out its GPU capability to Chinese language firms:” - A Thriller C.E.O. and Billions in Gross sales: Is China Shopping for Banned Nvidia Chips? NY Occasions, October 9, 2026
Megaspeed’s Malaysia subsidiary purchased practically $2 billion of Nvidia’s most superior merchandise; U.S. officers scrutinizing doable diversion to China. - Nvidia Chief Seen as Goal of Chinese language Spy Plot, NY Occasions, October 29, 2026
“A Chinese language businesswoman who had a detailed relationship with Jensen Huang was discovered to be passing intelligence to Beijing. President Trump was briefed and took no motion.” - China’s Prime Spy Company Recruited Lady Who Focused Jensen Huang, New York Occasions, November 6, 2026 (The FT was given the identical story)
“A memo that circulated amongst high policymakers within the Trump administration final spring cited intelligence {that a} Chinese language businesswoman who had a detailed relationship with Nvidia’s chief govt was a spy for China’s Ministry of State Safety, in response to folks briefed on the intelligence.” - Rubio Warned Officers About Nvidia Chief’s Entanglement With Chinese language Spy November 8, 2026
“Secretary of State Marco Rubio oversaw the drafting of the extremely categorized memo this previous spring warning high Trump administration officers that Nvidia’s chief govt, Jensen Huang, was in a detailed relationship with a Chinese language spy, a number of folks briefed on the matter mentioned.”
All of this led to Jensen Huang sending the e-mail beneath to all Nvidia workers on Sunday:
I owe my household and all of you an apology.
I used to be untrue to my spouse. My actions harm her and our kids. There isn’t any excuse for what I did. I’m deeply sorry.
All through my life, my household has given me love and assist. They deserve my honesty and loyalty. As a substitute, I allow them to down and broken the life we constructed collectively. I take full duty for what I did and the harm I brought on, and I settle for the criticism that comes with it.
To my spouse and household: I like you. I do know an apology can not undo what I’ve performed. I hope our household will heal and that, over time, I can earn again your belief.
To my colleagues at NVIDIA, together with these I’ve labored alongside for many years, and to our board, companions, and shareholders around the globe: you deserve higher from me. Main NVIDIA is the privilege of my life. My duty is to serve you and be worthy of your belief. I’ve fallen in need of that duty. I’m absolutely dedicated to NVIDIA and can work to earn again your confidence.
Relating to the nationwide safety considerations raised in information stories, NVIDIA’s Board of Administrators has initiated an impartial investigation. I assist the investigation and can cooperate absolutely. I like our nation and our firm. I’m dedicated to defending NVIDIA and supporting America’s nationwide safety. I’m proud and grateful to be an American.
My household bears no duty for my decisions. I do. Please give them privateness.
Jensen
Adopted by the next assertion from the Nvidia Board of Administrators:
The NVIDIA Board is initiating an impartial investigation in gentle of latest reporting that founder and CEO Jensen Huang has been the goal of a overseas intelligence effort.
A committee of impartial administrators, assisted by exterior impartial counsel, will oversee the investigation.
The Board prioritizes U.S. nationwide and financial safety, which is paramount to the pursuits of NVIDIA and its shareholders.
Whereas the Board has no motive to imagine that both nationwide safety or NVIDIA secrets and techniques have been compromised, the Board’s inquiry will look at all accessible info.
Jensen absolutely helps the overview and has dedicated to cooperating with it.
The Board has confidence in Jensen and his management crew and can present additional updates as acceptable.
Tuesday, the Board adopted up with information that it had “retained former performing U.S. Lawyer of the Southern District of New York Joon H. Kim and his agency Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz to conduct a radical and impartial investigation.”
Nvidia will launch its 3Q monetary outcomes subsequent Tuesday, November 17, at 2 p.m. PT.
All of this led former BlackRock portfolio supervisor Ed Dowd to touch upon the timing on the Espresso and a Mike podcast:
I imply, I feel this has been on the market for some time. And what I discover attention-grabbing is the timing of it post-midterms. Proper earlier than the Nvidia earnings. It’s been identified that Nvidia has been type of a mafia mob boss in relation to their chips. There’s been, , lots of stories that they pressure all of the consumers to purchase solely from them as a result of they offer financing.
So, and Jensen is clearly as a result of he needs…He’s about promoting chips. He’s a pick-and-shovel man for the AI gold rush. He needs to promote as many chips as doable. So, he’s professional open supply. So, I feel I feel the deep state in all probability doesn’t need open supply. They wish to management the AI finally, they usually don’t need folks to have entry to cheaper fashions.
So, I feel it’s very suspicious that that is all popping out now, in my humble opinion. I imply, I feel it was there. And I’m not saying, , Jensen’s ought to get off the hook, however the timing, I’m all the time about timing, and the timing is attention-grabbing.
B. from Moon of Alabama additionally smells a rat:
I’m wondering what this ‘spy’ story is admittedly about.
Whereas Jensen Huang has technical information, he’s by far too distant from the myriad particulars of chip manufacturing to make him a priceless goal for know-how espionage. There may be additionally no must push him to argue towards export restrictions to China. Nvidia, in its personal curiosity, has all the time favored limitless commerce.
Alice Huang might properly have had talks with Chinese language authorities. (Not solely in China do enterprise folks with ‘attention-grabbing’ enterprise contacts in ‘enemy’ nations often have such chats.) However I discover it unlikely that she was particularly tasked with concentrating on Jensen Huang. Her position is simply too elaborate.
The managed leak concerning the relation between the 2 Huangs, and the fully unverifiable spy allegations on high of that indiscretion, seemingly have a distinct objective.
Plenty of folks dislike Jensen Huang, who’s from Taiwan, for his ethnicity. They dislike his management over Nvidia and the sky-high costs of its chips. There are folks, like Anthropic chief Dario Amodei, who argue for harsher restriction on Chinese language open supply AI fashions.
Eradicating Jensen Huang from Nvidia would in all probability tank the corporate on the middle of the AI bubble. It’s not a great motive. So the goal could also be Jensen Huang however he will not be the one one.
There are others, like Marco Rubio, for whom something China is all the time the enemy. To leak this now could also be designed to cripple Trump and/or to sabotage the upcoming Trump and Xi summit. Rubio needs to run in 2028 and the hawks he wants as assist behind himself like such interventions.
In the meantime Jensen Huang has admitted that he has had an intimate relation with Alice. For now he’ll keep on the high of his firm whereas its board will examine the ‘spy’ allegations.
Arnaud Bertand, a French China booster, factors out that allegations aren’t proof:
So I seemed into these allegations that Jensen had a romantic relationship with a Chinese language spy and, paradoxically, the one precise proof now we have that somebody is whoring themselves out to spies on this story is the media – all the remainder is unsubstantiated, simply journalists repeating what nameless US intelligence officers advised them.
I’m not exaggerating, I truly learn all the important thing articles on this:
1) New York Occasions on Oct 29, the preliminary “scoop”: https://t.co/E122RznhSa
Declare: Alice Huang is a Chinese language intelligence asset funneling info to Beijing.
“Proof”: they have been advised so by “folks briefed on the surveillance, who spoke on the situation of anonymity as a result of the findings are drawn from categorized intelligence…” That’s it. The Occasions even admits it couldn’t decide which company monitored her, what she handed alongside, or its worth to China. In different phrases, they didn’t confirm the spy declare in any respect.
2) Wall Avenue Journal on Oct 30: https://t.co/IbUk6yTpfv
Declare: The US, Singapore and Taiwan suspect Alice Huang is a Chinese language intelligence supply, with Singapore and Taiwan even placing bodily surveillance groups on her.
“Proof”: “folks accustomed to the matter mentioned.” That’s it. And the story truly fell aside inside a day since Singapore’s House Affairs ministry went on the file with a public rebuke of the WSJ article (https://t.co/JBXvZayuBF) stating that “neither the Singapore Authorities nor its officers mentioned this,” and that “there have been no such investigations performed in respect of Alice Huang.” Taiwan declined to remark. In different phrases, the one authorities they invoked that went on the file denied the declare publicly.
3) New York Occasions once more on Nov 6, the “MSS recruit” story: https://t.co/tu9Re4WdzM
Declare: Alice Huang was recruited by China’s Ministry of State Safety (MSS) particularly to gather intelligence on Jensen.
“Proof”: “in response to folks briefed on U.S. surveillance.” That’s it. No new proof, no doc, no on-record supply for the declare. But the headline states it as plain reality, with out even an “allegedly.”
4) The Monetary Occasions, quoted beneath, on Nov 7 with the romance declare: https://t.co/4y9n4wacRW
Declare: A US authorities memo says Jensen had a romantic relationship with Alice Huang.
“Proof”: “mentioned folks accustomed to the memo.” That’s it: nameless folks describing a memo the FT by no means noticed, which itself describes intelligence no person can examine.
—
It’s correctly extraordinary when you concentrate on it and also you couldn’t make it up: she’s accused of being an intelligence asset, but the one folks we are able to truly watch behaving as intelligence property – and admitting so in writing (since they freely cite spies as their solely supply) – are Western journalists.
Issues are so dangerous that we’ve forgotten what precise journalism is: actual journalists – when nameless intelligence officers inform them one thing – would deal with it as a result in examine, not as a reality. They’d ask: why are they leaking this, why now, and who advantages? And, most significantly, they’d attempt to confirm the claims independently earlier than printing them – which is meant to be journalism 101 and wasn’t performed right here.
You’d assume one thing would have been realized from the Iraq WMD story and the numerous different examples of the press laundering intelligence claims into front-page “info.” Apparently not – and it’s even the identical newspaper, the New York Occasions, main the cost.
— Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) November 8, 2026
Full textual content:
So I seemed into these allegations that Jensen had a romantic relationship with a Chinese language spy and, paradoxically, the one precise proof now we have that somebody is whoring themselves out to spies on this story is the media – all the remainder is unsubstantiated, simply journalists repeating what nameless US intelligence officers advised them. I’m not exaggerating, I truly learn all the important thing articles on this:
1) New York Occasions on Oct 29, the preliminary “scoop”:
nytimes.com/2026/10/29/us/Declare: Alice Huang is a Chinese language intelligence asset funneling info to Beijing. “Proof”: they have been advised so by “folks briefed on the surveillance, who spoke on the situation of anonymity as a result of the findings are drawn from categorized intelligence…” That’s it. The Occasions even admits it couldn’t decide which company monitored her, what she handed alongside, or its worth to China. In different phrases, they didn’t confirm the spy declare in any respect.2) Wall Avenue Journal on Oct 30: wsj.com/tech/chinese-eDeclare: The US, Singapore and Taiwan suspect Alice Huang is a Chinese language intelligence supply, with Singapore and Taiwan even placing bodily surveillance groups on her. “Proof”: “folks accustomed to the matter mentioned.” That’s it. And the story truly fell aside inside a day since Singapore’s House Affairs ministry went on the file with a public rebuke of the WSJ article (mha.gov.sg/media-room/new) stating that “neither the Singapore Authorities nor its officers mentioned this,” and that “there have been no such investigations performed in respect of Alice Huang.” Taiwan declined to remark. In different phrases, the one authorities they invoked that went on the file denied the declare publicly.
3) New York Occasions once more on Nov 6, the “MSS recruit” story: nytimes.com/2026/11/06/us/Declare: Alice Huang was recruited by China’s Ministry of State Safety (MSS) particularly to gather intelligence on Jensen. “Proof”: “in response to folks briefed on U.S. surveillance.” That’s it. No new proof, no doc, no on-record supply for the declare. But the headline states it as plain reality, with out even an “allegedly.” 4) The Monetary Occasions, quoted beneath, on Nov 7 with the romance declare: ft.com/content material/a55a2aDeclare: A US authorities memo says Jensen had a romantic relationship with Alice Huang. “Proof”: “mentioned folks accustomed to the memo.” That’s it: nameless folks describing a memo the FT by no means noticed, which itself describes intelligence no person can examine. — It’s correctly extraordinary when you concentrate on it and also you couldn’t make it up: she’s accused of being an intelligence asset, but the one folks we are able to truly watch behaving as intelligence property – and admitting so in writing (since they freely cite spies as their solely supply) – are Western journalists. Issues are so dangerous that we’ve forgotten what precise journalism is: actual journalists – when nameless intelligence officers inform them one thing – would deal with it as a result in examine, not as a reality. They’d ask: why are they leaking this, why now, and who advantages? And, most significantly, they’d attempt to confirm the claims independently earlier than printing them – which is meant to be journalism 101 and wasn’t performed right here. You’d assume one thing would have been realized from the Iraq WMD story and the numerous different examples of the press laundering intelligence claims into front-page “info.” Apparently not – and it’s even the identical newspaper, the New York Occasions, main the cost.
He additionally factors out one other weak point within the story:
That is the largest irony of the entire Alice Huang / Nvidia saga: the Chinese language authorities truly doesn’t need Nvidia chips and is actively protecting them overseas.
Final yr it even ordered Alibaba and ByteDance to cancel their Nvidia orders (https://t.co/T4ZMand2BD) and despatched customs groups to the ports to examine each superior chip coming in (https://t.co/UFPerK7Cgp).
And proper now 600,000 Nvidia H200s are caught in Hong Kong as a result of Beijing received’t allow them to into the nation (https://t.co/epimhGPQYq)👇
Nvidia additionally explicitly frames this as a risk to its enterprise in its newest annual report back to the SEC: “The Chinese language authorities has inspired clients to buy from our China-based rivals and discouraged clients from buying, importing, or utilizing our knowledge middle merchandise” (https://t.co/TQVwWuix83).
Why does China try this? As a result of each Nvidia chip a Chinese language firm buys is one which Huawei or Cambricon doesn’t promote, and home chips can solely catch up if folks truly purchase them (which suggests cash for R&D, and many others.).
Which implies that the notion that Chinese language intelligence was working honeytraps to get extra Nvidia chips into China will get the entire thing precisely backwards.
In truth, it appears like Megaspeed – Alice Huang’s firm – was a counter-reaction to official Chinese language coverage: a personal sector workaround to those efforts by the Chinese language authorities to curtail Nvidia.
As was extensively reported – together with by Western media – Megaspeed constructed knowledge facilities in Southeast Asia and rented their computing energy to Alibaba, which the New York Occasions known as “a backdoor method of getting entry” to Nvidia chips (https://t.co/tu9Re4WdzM).
That could be a backdoor not solely – allegedly – round Washington’s export controls, but additionally round China’s personal efforts to wean its firms off Nvidia.
I can’t imagine the Chinese language authorities was too thrilled about it: it’d make nearly zero sense for it to run numerous home measures to stop Alibaba from utilizing Nvidia chips, but on the identical time have its high spy company assist the identical Alibaba get Nvidia chips via the again door in Southeast Asia 🤷
On the finish of the day, as with all such tales, you all the time want to have a look at “cui bono?”: who advantages? Who benefitted is fairly clear:
– Nvidia itself: it’s within the enterprise of promoting chips so a buyer keen to spend billions of {dollars} on chips in Southeast Asia is a godsend. Once more, as they themselves state of their SEC filings, not with the ability to faucet into Chinese language demand would have “a cloth and adversarial impression on our enterprise” (https://t.co/TQVwWuix83).
– Chinese language firms like Alibaba: info are, 1) Chinese language chips haven’t but caught up, 2) Chinese language chip firms’ manufacturing capabilities are nonetheless restricted and three) Chinese language tech companies’ historic tech stack runs on Nvidia’s CUDA ecosystem, and rewriting years of code for Huawei chips is painful. Renting Nvidia chips in Southeast Asia is the simple method to keep aggressive and serve buyer demand within the meantime.
– The US, in response to core members of the Trump administration: again in July final yr, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick defined that the purpose of letting Nvidia promote extra chips to China was to get Chinese language builders “hooked on the American know-how stack” (https://t.co/WpaKkS6gOG).
Who does NOT profit, in response to official Chinese language coverage, is the Chinese language state, which has made tech self-reliance considered one of its foremost priorities.
Which implies that, to imagine the spy story, you need to imagine that an individual – Alice Huang – was successfully a spy paid by her personal authorities whereas concurrently sabotaging its tech self-reliance drive, which it has spent years and trillions of {dollars} on – fairly mindless.
Stranger issues have occurred, I suppose, but it surely doesn’t cross the odor check.
And there’s one other completely main contradiction within the media story. In response to a Monetary Occasions article revealed yesterday (https://t.co/7q1UEaUR4y), “an individual who is aware of [Alice Huang] mentioned they’d been requested by MSS for details about her earlier this yr after information emerged that Singapore was investigating the corporate in relation to chip-smuggling allegations. The company wished to search out out extra details about Huang, together with the character of her enterprise and connections, the particular person mentioned.”
Which raises a rattling apparent query: if she have been certainly an MSS asset, why on earth would the MSS must ask the folks round her who she was and the character of her enterprise?
It’s an entire contradiction with the spy story – however very a lot not a contradiction with what I described above: a personal businesswoman working a workaround to Beijing’s personal coverage, which the Chinese language safety equipment would naturally wish to look into.
Particularly since, round about the identical time, Shanghai police detained her enterprise accomplice, reportedly her husband, in a inventory manipulation case (https://t.co/KXimvioTTd): additionally coherent with Chinese language authorities trying into her community, and far more durable to sq. together with her being a prized MSS asset.
And, to high all of it, there’s – to today – not a shred of proof that’s been revealed that she is, in actual fact, a Chinese language spy: simply nameless intelligence officers, repeated by journalists who by no means verified it, as I detailed right here (https://t.co/loSwtoVrqr) and right here (https://t.co/fIWGMIF3Cr) with one of many key FT journalists on this story truly admitting that he has no concept what proof US intelligence truly has.
So the declare went to print with out anybody seeing the proof, with out anybody with the ability to examine it, and with out anybody realizing whether or not it even exists.
And given every thing above, from Beijing blocking the very chips she was supposedly recruited to assist get into China, to the MSS asking round about her, to her accomplice being detained in Shanghai, my wager is that the proof doesn’t exist in any respect. If something, every thing we are able to examine factors the opposite method.
— Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) November 11, 2026
Brian Berletic additionally has some ideas:
🇺🇸🇨🇳 On the US-Nvidia Political Circus
▪️An precise, actual spy investigation would neither be leaked to main Western propaganda platforms (who work immediately with intelligence companies to form narratives within the first place) nor be reported by them till the investigation was concluded and actions already taken;
▪️As a substitute, “leaks” like this are used to prepare deliberate political circus meant to govern the general public, strain China on this case, and probably even strain or seize management of points of Nvidia’s operations by concentrating on its senior management;
▪️There’s something revealing right here relating to the US company oligarchy utilizing its energy to command/management and strain particular person companies – to not take actions to serve the American folks’s finest pursuits, however to serve the collective greed of the bigger company oligarchy itself (all the time on the American folks’s expense), whereas “combating Communist China” who’s “evil” particularly as a result of it instructions and controls companies to truly serve the very best pursuits of the folks;
— Brian Berletic (@BrianJBerletic) November 11, 2026
In the meantime, the story retains constructing.
Listed below are the “4 jaw-dropping revelations ” (per Gary Marcus) that dropped Monday and Tuesday:
Commerce Dept. Chip Inquiry Was Halted After Nvidia Intervention New York Occasions, November 9, 2026
An investigation into Megaspeed, a Singapore firm that was shopping for superior Nvidia A.I. chips, was transferred to the Justice Division after a high Nvidia govt reached out to Commerce Division officers.
From MIT prof Yasheng Huang
One issue for Jensen is having to elucidate his insistence to promote to Megaspeed when there was an enormous backlog of orders for his chips. He might have offered his chips to those clients simply and as lucratively slightly than getting himself into this difficult state of affairs.
— Yasheng Huang 黄亚生 (@YashengHuang) November 9, 2026
A captivating 4-minute clip from the @dwarkesh_sp interview with Jensen Huang in April 2026.
Requested why he’s so eager to promote GPU chips to China, Huang is evasive, defensive, deflective, and irrational, going off on weird tangents and insults — and refusing to reply the important thing query.
— Geoffrey Miller (@gmiller) November 9, 2026
From former NSC Senior Director for China & State Dep China Coordinator Julian Gewirtz:
Jensen Huang reportedly instructed his crew at Nvidia “by no means to consider” planning for a Taiwan contingency.
Even though their enterprise is reliant on TSMC.
The Jensen-Megaspeed mess actually places these unimaginable — and barely-noticed — particulars from Stephen Witt’s The Considering Machine in a brand new gentle:
Huang refuses to contemplate the impression on his international enterprise if China have been to blockade or invade Taiwan, regardless of the common threats emanating from Beijing to just do that. “To my nice shock, Nvidia had performed no contingency planning for this eventuality,” Witt writes.
He quotes Deb Shoquist, Nvidia’s govt vice-president of operations: “If one thing occurs to Taiwan and TSMC, the ramifications are so giant it’s nearly like asking me what I’d do if California fell into the ocean.” Huang had instructed her “by no means to consider this query.”
—from my @nybooks essay earlier this yr on Nvidia and American coverage towards China: https://t.co/xfn5RqtKy3
—extra ideas from me right now: https://t.co/lQG6IFcdwh
— Julian Gewirtz (@JulianGewirtz) November 9, 2026
Full textual content:
Jensen Huang reportedly instructed his crew at Nvidia “by no means to consider” planning for a Taiwan contingency.
Even though their enterprise is reliant on TSMC.
The Jensen-Megaspeed mess actually places these unimaginable — and barely-noticed — particulars from Stephen Witt’s The Considering Machine in a brand new gentle:
Huang refuses to contemplate the impression on his international enterprise if China have been to blockade or invade Taiwan, regardless of the common threats emanating from Beijing to just do that. “To my nice shock, Nvidia had performed no contingency planning for this eventuality,” Witt writes.
He quotes Deb Shoquist, Nvidia’s govt vice-president of operations: “If one thing occurs to Taiwan and TSMC, the ramifications are so giant it’s nearly like asking me what I’d do if California fell into the ocean.” Huang had instructed her “by no means to consider this query.”
We’ll come again to Gewirtz in a second, however first there was one more “jaw-dropper” within the NYT yesterday:
Regardless of Denial, Trump Was Instructed on Journey to China About Spying on Nvidia Chief
President Trump was advised aboard Air Drive One in Might en path to China that the US had obtained delicate intelligence exhibiting that Nvidia’s chief govt was in a relationship with a girl believed to be a Chinese language spy, folks with information of the matter mentioned.
The message was delivered by Marco Rubio, his secretary of state and nationwide safety adviser, shortly earlier than the Nvidia chief, Jensen Huang, joined the presidential journey to Beijing at Mr. Trump’s invitation. It marked not less than the second time in seven months that the president had been advised of intelligence about Mr. Huang’s involvement with the lady.
The existence of the beforehand unreported replace given to Mr. Trump contradicts the president’s assertion on Monday that he had not identified on the time of the journey about Mr. Huang’s relationship with the lady, who U.S. officers had concluded was working for China’s Ministry of State Safety.
Hmmm, I’m wondering who leaked this story to the Occasions? And if my suspicions are well-founded, what does Marco Rubio acquire from (possibly) blowing up the Trump administration’s uneasy commerce truce with China?
And only one extra:
🚨 BREAKING: Shareholders SUE Nvidia and Jensen Huang over alleged concealment of nationwide safety dangers. Foremost allegations & my opinion:
“Defendants made false and/or deceptive statements and/or didn’t disclose that:
(1) Jensen Huang had an affair with a suspected Chinese language spy, who additionally has a job at an organization known as Megaspeed, which is suspected of serving to China evade export controls;
(2) as such, Nvidia’s statements about its relationship with Megaspeed have been materially false and deceptive in any respect related instances;
(3) the foregoing raised considerations within the nationwide safety neighborhood about Nvidia and, if revealed, offered a cloth threat to the Firm’s popularity and enterprise prospects; and
(4) because of this, Defendants’ public statements have been materially false and/or deceptive in any respect related instances.”
👉 My opinion: due to the private nature of the affair and the authorized implications it triggered (the investigation into the extent of the hurt continues to be pending), Jensen will in all probability need to resign.
👉 Extra in my publication. Be part of 103,000+ subscribers beneath.
— Luiza Jarovsky, PhD (@LuizaJarovsky) November 10, 2026
And as for the implications of all this for US/China relations, let’s discuss with China hawk Julian Gewirtz’ Substack “Paper Tiger” (guess who that’s):
As Trump prepares to fulfill with Xi once more in lower than two weeks, the timing of those explosive revelations might considerably constrain one of the influential voices who has formed Trump’s extra accommodating line on China, in addition to the administration’s broader strategy to AI.
Requested on Sunday whether or not he ought to have acted on the warning, Trump replied, “No, I don’t assume so.” As journalists and Congress examine this mess, there are numerous main questions that want solutions:
Why did Trump select to not act on the warning concerning the relationship, and what, if something, did the remainder of his administration do?
When did Commerce study of the intelligence about Alice Huang, and what occurred to chip shipments to Megaspeed after that? (Chris McGuire argues on X, “Commerce might have blocked chip shipments to Megaspeed the second it came upon that it was run by a Chinese language spy, but it surely didn’t.”)
Will Trump increase the spy scandal immediately with Xi in Shenzhen?
What would be the results of Nvidia’s investigation of its revered founder and CEO?
Will Jensen Huang lose Trump’s ear — and can that have an effect on the course of Trump’s China coverage much more than new Democratic majorities in each Homes of Congress?
It’s price remembering that Huang wasn’t on the unique record for Trump’s journey to Beijing in Might. The president invited him on the final minute, and Huang caught up with Air Drive One on a refueling cease in Anchorage. Now three Republican Home committee chairs have requested Huang to temporary them behind closed doorways on November 18 — simply because the APEC leaders’ assembly opens in Shenzhen.
On Sunday, a reporter requested Trump whether or not he would convey Huang alongside on his subsequent journey to Asia. Trump replied, “I don’t know, however I’d definitely take him.”
Veteran reporter (one would possibly even name him a “China hand”) Nury Vittachi feedback on the sudden change in tone in Taiwanese media protection of Nvidia and Jensen Huang:
BOING! Taiwan’s pro-Washington media has made a spectacular backflip to hitch the CIA-led marketing campaign to interchange Nvidia’s Jensen Huang with a China-hostile chief.
With breathtaking velocity, the Chinese language island’s media shops have switched from extreme hero worship of the Nvidia chief (“Jensanity”) to harshly demonizing him—protecting rigidly in step with the narrative pushed by the US intelligence neighborhood via evidence-free “honeypot espionage” allegations revealed within the New York Occasions.
.
SMASHING A CHAIR OVER YOUR HEAD
Jensen Huang was a “tyrant” boss who advised a workers member: “I’ll smash this chair over your head,” mentioned a extremely vital report in Taiwan’s Mirror Media on Monday. “He admitted to tormenting his workers.”Sanlih E-Tv, a Taiwan media group carefully related to the extremely unpopular Washington-allied DPP authorities, reported that Huang would “smash his fist” on the desk, “yell at subordinates” and “steadily reprimanded them harshly in public”.
As properly has his love affair, “his extraordinarily strict ‘office tyrant’ persona has additionally been uncovered,” the information outlet added. “Huang admitted that he would slightly ‘torture’ workers to unleash their potential than simply dismiss them.”
.
COMMON AS DIRT
Taiwan residents, who’re way more clever than politicians and journalists assume, are astonished by the change, since having a mistress is de rigueur for high native businessmen, and table-thumping bosses are frequent as grime.The DPP has served Washington since its inception. Whereas the CIA spin-off often known as the NED all the time claims to advertise democracy normally, it brazenly labored in Taiwan to place the US-aligned DPP in energy. (This was admitted by Kenneth Wollack of the NED’s IRI division in a 2004 speech.)
The change from praising domestically born Jensen Huang to demonizing him reveals Washington how obedient they’re.
“Apart from parroting US intel’s ‘spy mistress’ allegations, Taiwan DPP get together media are actually working items trashing Jensen Huang as ‘a nasty boss’,” mentioned Paul Huang, Analysis Fellow at Taiwan Public Opinion Basis, in a put up on X.
“Beforehand TW govt & state media all the time portrayed Jensen hagiographically, a ‘delight’ of TW given his root and Nvidia chip biz with TW.”
Jensen Huang has repeatedly known as for a greater relationship between the US and China – triggering a marketing campaign to have him changed with somebody extra pro-conflict.
The US is determined to win the AI race, however the world’s richest nation is apprehensive by the creativity of the hardworking Chinese language nerd neighborhood.
.
.— Nury Vittachi (@NuryVittachi) November 11, 2026
Mo Bitar had a concept about how this all occurred, and his appears to level to a Congressional Democrat slightly than Rubio:
October twenty ninth, the primary story. November third, the election. November fifth, Congress asks for a closed door briefing. November sixth, any person fingers the New York Occasions that categorized memo. November eighth, the e-mail and Nvidia stories earnings on the seventeenth. That’s not how information breaks. That’s how any person releases it.
…
Right here’s what I feel occurred. The folks in Washington who wished to cease promoting chips to China misplaced that struggle the day the president took his 25%. In order that they leaked the memo as an alternative.
They usually tried every thing else first. The GAIN AI Act, the AI Overwatch Act, offended letters to the Commerce Secretary, and an invite to testify earlier than the Senate that Jensen merely declined. Payments take years, however a intercourse scandal takes one information cycle. And now the loudest voice in America for promoting chips to China is a man who had an affair with an alleged Chinese language spy.
…
And it labored. This week, Elizabeth Warren mentioned, “We should cross bipartisan laws to maintain our superior AI know-how out of China’s fingers.” And no person in Washington goes to face subsequent to Jensen and argue.
The individuals who wish to management AI misplaced each vote, each invoice, and each assembly on the White Home. They usually received anyway with one memo about the place Jensen’s been placing his d**ok.
And this tweet names particular congressional names:
The Actual Play Behind Jensen Huang’s “Spy” Scandal: A Traditional DC Two-for-One
Don’t let the “Chinese language spy” tabloid drama idiot you. The true story behind Jensen Huang’s affair scandal might have much less to do with espionage than with pure Washington politics. US China hawks could also be attempting to drag off a basic “two birds, one stone” play.
First, they wish to kneecap Jensen’s affect in DC. Huang has efficiently lobbied the Trump administration to ease export controls on high-end AI chips just like the H200, a transfer that has drawn sturdy opposition from China hawks in each events. Linking his affair to an govt at a agency suspected of chip smuggling affords a handy method to undermine his credibility, increase questions on whether or not he may very well be compromised, and put strain on the White Home to tighten the screws on chip exports once more.
Second, they’re pushing the “Chinese language spies are in all places” narrative to fire up safety panic. Spinning a private affair and a enterprise compliance dispute right into a “Chinese language spy” story—with out publicly presenting arduous proof—performs straight into Western fears. It smears China’s picture whereas giving Congress political ammunition to push for harsher tech restrictions and tighter controls on cross-border expertise and enterprise exchanges.
Take a look at the timing—it’s arduous to not increase questions. US intelligence reportedly knew concerning the matter greater than a yr in the past, and Trump had reportedly been briefed on the intelligence considerations. But the story solely broke within the press on October 29—simply days earlier than the midterms and weeks forward of Trump’s deliberate Asia journey, with Huang’s participation within the delegation nonetheless beneath dialogue. The timing, adopted by Huang’s November 8 assertion, inevitably raises questions on why the knowledge surfaced when it did. That “sit on it, then drop it at a politically handy second” sample appears very very similar to basic DC selective leaking.
Take a look at who’s main the cost: Brian Mast @RepBrianMast, John Moolenaar @RepMoolenaar
, and Rick Crawford @RepRickCrawford
—the Republican chairmen of the Home International Affairs, China, and Intelligence committees—who simply demanded a closed-door briefing from Huang. In the meantime, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren @SenWarren has individually challenged Nvidia over its China-related chip exports. All 4 are longtime critics of Huang’s China chip gross sales and Massive Tech’s lobbying energy.Overlook the spy thriller narrative and have a look at what Jensen Huang’s opponents in Washington may very well be attempting to attain. With the midterms now behind them and Democrats set to take management of Congress within the subsequent session, the true tug-of-war over AI regulation and China chip coverage between Trump and the incoming Democratic-led Congress is simply getting began. #JensenHuang #Nvidia #Geopolitics #Bigtech #China $NVDA
— 观察者网 (@realGuancha) November 11, 2026
Full textual content:
The Actual Play Behind Jensen Huang’s “Spy” Scandal: A Traditional DC Two-for-One
Don’t let the “Chinese language spy” tabloid drama idiot you. The true story behind Jensen Huang’s affair scandal might have much less to do with espionage than with pure Washington politics. US China hawks could also be attempting to drag off a basic “two birds, one stone” play.
First, they wish to kneecap Jensen’s affect in DC. Huang has efficiently lobbied the Trump administration to ease export controls on high-end AI chips just like the H200, a transfer that has drawn sturdy opposition from China hawks in each events. Linking his affair to an govt at a agency suspected of chip smuggling affords a handy method to undermine his credibility, increase questions on whether or not he may very well be compromised, and put strain on the White Home to tighten the screws on chip exports once more.
Second, they’re pushing the “Chinese language spies are in all places” narrative to fire up safety panic. Spinning a private affair and a enterprise compliance dispute right into a “Chinese language spy” story—with out publicly presenting arduous proof—performs straight into Western fears. It smears China’s picture whereas giving Congress political ammunition to push for harsher tech restrictions and tighter controls on cross-border expertise and enterprise exchanges.
Take a look at the timing—it’s arduous to not increase questions. US intelligence reportedly knew concerning the matter greater than a yr in the past, and Trump had reportedly been briefed on the intelligence considerations. But the story solely broke within the press on October 29—simply days earlier than the midterms and weeks forward of Trump’s deliberate Asia journey, with Huang’s participation within the delegation nonetheless beneath dialogue. The timing, adopted by Huang’s November 8 assertion, inevitably raises questions on why the knowledge surfaced when it did. That “sit on it, then drop it at a politically handy second” sample appears very very similar to basic DC selective leaking.
Take a look at who’s main the cost: Brian Mast, John Moolenaar, and Rick Crawford
—the Republican chairmen of the Home International Affairs, China, and Intelligence committees—who simply demanded a closed-door briefing from Huang. In the meantime, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren has individually challenged Nvidia over its China-related chip exports. All 4 are longtime critics of Huang’s China chip gross sales and Massive Tech’s lobbying energy.Overlook the spy thriller narrative and have a look at what Jensen Huang’s opponents in Washington may very well be attempting to attain. With the midterms now behind them and Democrats set to take management of Congress within the subsequent session, the true tug-of-war over AI regulation and China chip coverage between Trump and the incoming Democratic-led Congress is simply getting began.
All of this can be a large win for China hawks who can now tie Nvidia to the unpopular Trump and tie Trump to the now-tainted Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
I’m curious what the large cash gamers consider this and if any of them have been concerned in pushing this story, which, as B. identified at Moon of Alabama, was mainly identified in late 2025 — the non-salacious components anyhow, as a result of there’s large cash at stake right here and a serious Nvidia share worth dive might go a great distance towards popping the AI bubble.
Additionally, provided that Trump getting his butt kicked by China within the commerce wars was one of the disastrous occasions of his first time period, who’s pushing a renewal of battle with the Center Kingdom, and the way do they count on to profit?
Associated Posts


